![]() ![]() Which makes it tough because then if you get deep in BeAGM mode, the regens will be so much better than they should be. Over or under exaggerating ratings is not a bad thing. The one (of many) problems with EA's rosters is that the ratings, even a 10 point difference, are still too close to notice any difference in game play. Coaches, keep track of your teams schedule, league teams, and players contact information with this accessible sports roster template. But he'll still perform as a top defenseman because his D ratings will be high. I posted in MattGs Ultimate Roster thread but I wanted to make it official with my own thread. The other OFF ratings will probably be lower and his overall might be low 80's. NHL 16 Project Realism Roster Spreadsheet. In the long run, you have to look at how the player will perform rated against other players, not what his OVR "should" be.Įxample: You might want a player like Duncan Keith to be a 88+ rated OVR player, but it's his DEF ratings that need to be high. When rating players, it seems everyone gets worried that certain players should be an 80+ overall. I assume those are OVRs, but I still think there needs to be more distance. ![]() Your bottom 6 and elite are only 11 points off. I think you need more separation between the classes. Here's my initial impression on the new ratings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |